Releasing the secular
stranglehold
By John C Beyer Director of mediawatch-uk
I |
t
has long been an objective of the Christian community in Britain to use the
media to promote the Good News. This has
been seen as a logical extension of the Lord's command to go and preach the
Gospel to all nations. In recent years
many Christians have responded to this call by harnessing technological
developments and involving themselves in setting up radio and television
stations, the commission and transmission of programming intended to bring the
Word to Mankind. There are, of course,
different ways of achieving this and today there are a host of channels on air
that talk about the many graces God bestows and the close prayerful
relationship that we, His creatures, should have with Him. There are also programmes that discuss
theological matters, others that discuss the human condition and the right way
to live our lives in accordance with what God has revealed.
All
this is good and adds to the rich tapestry that makes up contemporary
television and radio available at the press of a button. But we have to ask ourselves whether
programmes like this, good and wholesome though they may be, attract the people
most in need of spiritual awakening or whether they provide comfort viewing and
listening for existing believers, or an escape from the offensive material
elsewhere? The challenge that must be addressed, surely, is how to release the
secular stranglehold on prime time television and radio and bathe in the light
of Christ programming that occupies the screen in most households most nights
of the week.
V |
iewers
who have bought into multi-channel satellite or cable networks have many
programmes from which to choose their information, education and
entertainment. Flicking through the
many channels available, however, it is evident that the promise of greater
choice of programming is pretty much an illusion, certainly at the present
time. Along with repeats of soaps,
gardening and DIY there are numerous pop music channels and old, mainly
American, programmes dusted down from the archives. The recently published survey 'The
Public's View 2002' revealed that many people are simply not satisfied with
the programmes on offer.
Looking
through the television schedules for any week of the year there are very few
programmes that deal with anything other than material well being whether it be
giving your kitchen a space-age makeover, cooking a superb dinner for one in under
twenty minutes or demonstrating the latest technique for dieting. A recent science programme tried to show
that God is merely part of our physical make-up! Of course there are marvellous exceptions that relay the wonders
of God's creation, bringing us beautiful images of the animal kingdom that we
would never otherwise see. And of
course television makes familiar the great state and sporting occasions and,
sadly, the awful consequences of war.
Most
problems, however, arise with the way that human behaviour is portrayed. 'The
Public's View 2002' revealed that violence is a huge public concern with
58% saying there is too much of it on screen.
56% of respondents had worries about swearing and 44% had worries about
the portrayal of sexual conduct. More
than half of the people interviewed said that programme standards have dropped
across the board. The newspaper
headline said "Complaints rocket as TV turns up the violence". The latest report from mediawatch-uk
analysed 183 films shown on the five terrestrial channels. We identified 966 incidents involving
firearms and 701 violent assaults.
There are also the frequent documentaries about strip
clubs, brothels, lap-dancing clubs, the making and marketing of hardcore
pornography and 'reality' shows about the lives of those who work in the sex
industry. No wonder that a recent ITV
Teletext poll found that 98 per cent of 2,765 respondents agreed standards on
TV had slipped.
The
day before 'The Public's View 2002'
survey was published the Independent Television Commission reprimanded Channel
4 TV for showing a "lack of respect for human dignity" by
broadcasting, among other degrading things, a picture of a Chinese performance
artist eating a dead baby. Thankfully,
the ITC rightly said the programme, 'Beijing
Swings', was "contrary to good taste and decency" and there was
little justification for its transmission.
Channel 4 TV caused most offence in 2002 for the second year running
although a call from me to the Chairman of the ITC to revoke the licence was
rejected as inappropriate on the grounds that Channel 4's overall output is
well balanced. Of course there are many
excellent and innovative programmes on Channel 4 TV but these do not excuse
scandalous material like the above or like the recent three part drama about
the dysfunctional middle classes, sponsored by Renault, entitled '40'.
This portrayed the very worst excesses of human depravity, which, as TV
one critic accurately described it, "spluttered to a half-climax in a pool
of murder, violation and recrimination".
It is a great shame that so much contemporary programming is without
love, without faith and without hope.
I |
n
the last few years much attention has been focused on the consultation process
leading up to publication of the Communications Bill which will shortly receive
Royal Assent. Clause 307 of the Bill
sets out in detail the obligations placed on the Office of Communications
(Ofcom) to set standards objectives.
Gone are the existing requirements that programmes should not offend
good taste or decency or offend public feeling. The Government, despite concern vigorously expressed, has done
nothing to clarify the Bill with regard to regulating the content of
programmes. Ofcom will have a duty to see
"that generally accepted standards
are applied to the contents of television and radio services … so as to provide
adequate protection … from … offensive and harmful material". Ofcom will determine these terms in the
light of public reaction to programmes.
Accordingly, the onus on the viewing and listening public to complain or
protest will remain. The broadcasters
will be able to excuse themselves by improving media literacy and by providing
warnings and better programme information so that we can all avoid the
offensive material that they think is acceptable for transmission into our
homes.
Last
year mediawatch-uk published and circulated to all members of parliament a
detailed briefing paper entitled 'A Fair
Deal For Stakeholders' in which we made a number of proposals that we
believe would strengthen the position of viewers and listeners in the whole
broadcasting landscape. We suggested
that broadcasters do more to involve viewers and listeners in determining
programme policy. We welcome the BBC's
comment line and we welcome the more recently established Viewer Relations Unit
at the ITC. But it is no good keeping
these facilities hidden.
Much
more should be done to show respect for audiences by cutting out material
known, through surveys and opinion polls, to cause offence and concern. There should be programmes about
broadcasting and how the regulators fulfil their statutory objectives. Publicity should be given to the programme
codes and guidelines so that the viewing public can make informed comment. There should be access programmes that give
opportunities for concerns about standards to be addressed. Ofcom's Content Board must have a high
public profile with strong community links to the viewing and listening public
and it must act quickly to establish public confidence in its
deliberations. Greater effort must be
made to ensure that that everyone knows the point of contact. Ofcom must publish regular reports on
monitored programme content, TV and Radio channel performance reviews and analysis
of complaints received from the public - and above all, the action that has
been taken as a result.
We believe that there is also a role for the Church in
offering guidance to the viewing and listening public. People should be encouraged to become
"media literate" in terms of understanding the media's influence on
their lives, values, thinking and behaviour.
We should be helped to become discriminating viewers and listeners and
the most effective ways of 'making our voices heard' when necessary. Churches Together, for example, could issue
an information sheet encouraging people to confidently communicate with Ofcom
and the broadcasters. The Church could
also, perhaps, do more to insist that the broadcasters present an improved
moral tone and more civilised values than at present that will benefit our
society as a whole.
One thing is certain -
it is not enough to simply turn off.
Doing this will change nothing!
This article was first published in ‘New Voice’ (Vol 1 Issue 2) the journal of the Christian
Broadcasting Council.
For news and
information visit: www.cbc.org.uk
If you have something to say
about any TV or Radio programme ring Ofcom on 0845
456 3000 or
send e-mail to: [email protected]
If you have something to say
about BBC programmes call the comment line on: 08700
100222 or send an e-mail to: [email protected]
Click here for ‘Is Nothing Sacred?’
Click here for ‘The Blatant Blasphemy
Corporation?’
Click here for A Fair Deal For
Stakeholders
Click here for Being Media Literate
Click here for The Broadcasting Code
Click here for Ofcom: latest
developments
Click here for mediawatch-uk directory
Click here for Joining Form